The actual letters stand for:
Environment – these factors include the contribution either a company or government makes to climate change through greenhouse gas emissions, along with waste management and energy efficiency. Given renewed efforts to combat global warming; cutting emissions and decarbonising have become more and more important, and these issues have become investable themes.
Social – this includes things such as human rights, labour standards in the supply chain, any exposure to illegal child labour, and more routine issues such as adherence to workplace health and safety. A social score also rises if a company is well integrated with its local community – in short treating everyone equally and fairly, as you would like to be treated.
Governance – this refers to a set of rules or principles defining rights, responsibilities, and expectations between different stakeholders in the governance of corporations – by this we mean the duty of company directors. Historically companies were run with shareholder return as their main objective, times have changed, and governance is now relevant for all “stakeholders”. A stakeholder is any party that has an interest in a company and includes, investors, employees, customers, and suppliers.
A well-defined corporate governance system can be used to balance or align interests between stakeholders and can work as a tool to support a company’s long-term strategy as well as enhancing return.
As with all things investment related, one size does not fit all under “ESG”, but looking at and evaluating “ESG” the three key investor objectives, enable us to evaluate how far companies and countries have come with their sustainability.
Sustainability is important when assessing companies and forms part of “ESG” as this helps to generate long term competitive returns, as well as having a positive impact on both the people and the planet.
Overall, integrating these three pillars into our investment process should aid in achieving better outcomes.